I am an observer of
language
When I mess about
with it too much it becomes forced
Start with an audio
instead of writing
No- as well as
writing
So there’s the
transcript of the interview the talk
And then there’s the
audio- the audio will respond to the writing.
These are parallel
parts.
They disengage and
re-engage
It is an attempt to
represent what we read and what we hear and how we might engage with these 2
different things.
Dworkin and
Goldsmith- artists responding to work.
Description/response
Response/description
Want to apply some of
this critical perspective or framework to my own work and in particular use this
collection of texts to explore how others have done this before me- to enable
me to respond fluidly rather than forcefully.
The works I will use
to experiment with are 3 interviews with students.
I already have the
audio and text.
I want to play with
the audio.
No more than 2
minutes. This will allow for the audience to respond. I need to make a space
for the audience to hear read and respond. It needs to be conducive; people
need to be clear about what they can do in the space if they want to.
This will also allow
me to explore observations of how we read and how we listen. An example is the
ticket machine. This is my research- primary research in a way.
I want to create,
play with the transcript. Try some of the anthology examples as a way of practicing,
playing, just to keep me fresh. I can refine what I’ve done later. Playbox,
tool box.
Some of this has
grown as a response to and from the sound booth experiences gained through creative networks interviews. I’ve been living audio and text for so long.